bewCloud vs osmos::feed
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
bewCloud
File sharing + sync, notes, and photos (alternative to Nextcloud and
VS
osmos::feed
Build an RSS reader as a static site with GitHub Actions
| Feature | bewCloud | osmos::feed |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | docker | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,209 | ★ 991 |
| First released | 2026 | 2021 |
| Replaces | — | Feedly |
Why pick each one
Choose bewCloud if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
Choose osmos::feed if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 32 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is bewCloud or osmos::feed better?
Neither is universally better. bewCloud has the larger community, while osmos::feed is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are bewCloud and osmos::feed free and open-source?
Yes. bewCloud is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and osmos::feed under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run bewCloud and osmos::feed with Docker?
bewCloud: yes. osmos::feed: check the project docs for container support.