Feeder vs RSSBox
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Feeder
Lightweight offline RSS reader for Android
VS
RSSBox
Generate RSS feeds for sites without native feeds
| Feature | Feeder | RSSBox |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Kotlin | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,951 | ★ 814 |
| First released | 2015 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Feedly | RSS-Bridge |
Why pick each one
Choose Feeder if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (3k GitHub stars)
- Written in Kotlin
Choose RSSBox if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Ruby
Frequently asked questions
Is Feeder or RSSBox better?
Neither is universally better. Feeder has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Feeder and RSSBox free and open-source?
Yes. Feeder is licensed under GPL-3.0 and RSSBox under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Feeder and RSSBox with Docker?
Feeder: check the project docs for container support. RSSBox: yes.