osmos::feed vs Winds
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | osmos::feed | Winds |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Read-the-docs project | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 14 · At risk | 15 · At risk |
| Status | Actively maintained | Archived |
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 989 | ★ 9,092 |
| First released | 2021 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Feedly | Feedly |
What are osmos::feed and Winds?
osmos::feed
osmos::feed is a tool that turns a list of feeds into a self-hosted static RSS reader website using GitHub Actions. It requires no server and rebuilds the reader on a schedule.
- Static site RSS reader
- Runs on GitHub Actions
- No server required
Winds
Winds is an open-source RSS reader and podcast application with a polished interface. It can be self-hosted and offers personalized recommendations powered by activity feeds.
- RSS and podcast reader
- Polished modern interface
- Recommendation feeds
osmos::feed vs Winds: key differences
The biggest difference is maintenance: Winds's repository is archived and no longer developed, while osmos::feed is actively maintained. Osmos::feed is written in TypeScript, while Winds is built with JavaScript. Osmos::feed is the lighter option, starting around 32 MB of RAM against 1,024 MB for Winds. Winds is the more established project (first released 2017), while osmos::feed arrived in 2021. Winds has the considerably larger community, at 9,092 GitHub stars versus 989. Winds lists first-class Docker deployment; osmos::feed does not.
Why pick each one
Choose osmos::feed if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 32 MB RAM
Choose Winds if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 9.1k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is osmos::feed or Winds better?
Neither is universally better. Winds has the larger community, while osmos::feed is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are osmos::feed and Winds free and open-source?
Yes. osmos::feed is licensed under MIT and Winds under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run osmos::feed and Winds with Docker?
osmos::feed: check the project docs for container support. Winds: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, osmos::feed or Winds?
osmos::feed has the smaller minimum footprint at 32 MB of RAM, compared to about 1,024 MB for Winds. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.