RediSearch vs Stork
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
RediSearch
Full-text and vector search module for Redis
VS
Stork
Fast, accessible static site search in WebAssembly
| Feature | RediSearch | Stork |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | RSALv2 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Rust | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 6,205 | ★ 2,758 |
| First released | 2017 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Elasticsearch, Algolia | Algolia |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is RediSearch or Stork better?
Neither is universally better. RediSearch has the larger community, while Stork is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are RediSearch and Stork free and open-source?
Yes. RediSearch is licensed under RSALv2 and Stork under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run RediSearch and Stork with Docker?
RediSearch: yes. Stork: check the project docs for container support.