Pydio Cells vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePydio CellsSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 2,241★ 33,952
First released20182015
ReplacesDropbox, Box, Google DriveAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose Pydio Cells if…

  • Strong enterprise features
  • Modern Go codebase
  • Good access governance
Pydio Cells details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Pydio Cells or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Pydio Cells is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Pydio Cells and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. Pydio Cells is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Pydio Cells and SeaweedFS with Docker?

Pydio Cells: yes. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons