croc vs Pydio Cells

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecrocPydio Cells
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM32 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 39,485★ 2,241
First released20182018
ReplacesWeTransfer, AirDropDropbox, Box, Google Drive

Why pick each one

Choose croc if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 39.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
croc details

Choose Pydio Cells if…

  • Strong enterprise features
  • Modern Go codebase
  • Good access governance
Pydio Cells details

Frequently asked questions

Is croc or Pydio Cells better?

croc is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Pydio Cells if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are croc and Pydio Cells free and open-source?

Yes. croc is licensed under MIT and Pydio Cells under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run croc and Pydio Cells with Docker?

croc: check the project docs for container support. Pydio Cells: yes.

Related comparisons