Dufs vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDufsSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageRustGo
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM32 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 10,562★ 33,952
First released20222015
ReplacesDropbox, Google DriveAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose Dufs if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 10.6k GitHub stars
Dufs details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Dufs or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Dufs is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Dufs and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. Dufs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Dufs and SeaweedFS with Docker?

Dufs: yes. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons