Cloudreve vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCloudreveSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 28,485★ 33,952
First released20262015
ReplacesAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose Cloudreve if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 28.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
Cloudreve details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Cloudreve or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Cloudreve is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Cloudreve and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. Cloudreve is licensed under GPL-3.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Cloudreve and SeaweedFS with Docker?

Cloudreve: yes. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons