Ceph vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCephSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseLGPL-2.1Apache-2.0
LanguageC++Go
Setup difficultyHardHard
Min. RAM4,096 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, bare-metaldocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 16,905★ 33,952
First released20062015
ReplacesAmazon S3, Google DriveAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose Ceph if…

  • Released under the LGPL-2.1 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 16.9k GitHub stars
Ceph details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Ceph or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Ceph and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. Ceph is licensed under LGPL-2.1 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Ceph and SeaweedFS with Docker?

Ceph: yes. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons