Dufs vs Pydio Cells

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureDufsPydio Cells
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageRustGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM32 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 10,562★ 2,241
First released20222018
ReplacesDropbox, Google DriveDropbox, Box, Google Drive

Why pick each one

Choose Dufs if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 10.6k GitHub stars
Dufs details

Choose Pydio Cells if…

  • Strong enterprise features
  • Modern Go codebase
  • Good access governance
Pydio Cells details

Frequently asked questions

Is Dufs or Pydio Cells better?

Dufs is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Pydio Cells if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Dufs and Pydio Cells free and open-source?

Yes. Dufs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Pydio Cells under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Dufs and Pydio Cells with Docker?

Dufs: yes. Pydio Cells: yes.

Related comparisons