ProjectSend vs Updog
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
ProjectSend
Self-hosted client-oriented file sharing
VS
Updog
Replacement for Python SimpleHTTPServer with uploads
| Feature | ProjectSend | Updog |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | PHP | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,958 | ★ 3,386 |
| First released | 2012 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Dropbox, WeTransfer | WeTransfer |
Why pick each one
Choose ProjectSend if…
- Great for client deliverables
- Simple to operate
- Clear access control
Choose Updog if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (3.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is ProjectSend or Updog better?
Neither is universally better. Updog has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are ProjectSend and Updog free and open-source?
Yes. ProjectSend is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Updog under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ProjectSend and Updog with Docker?
ProjectSend: yes. Updog: check the project docs for container support.