ProjectSend vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureProjectSendPuter
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePHPTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 1,958★ 43,003
First released20122026
ReplacesDropbox, WeTransfer

Why pick each one

Choose ProjectSend if…

  • Great for client deliverables
  • Simple to operate
  • Clear access control
ProjectSend details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is ProjectSend or Puter better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community, while ProjectSend is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are ProjectSend and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. ProjectSend is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run ProjectSend and Puter with Docker?

ProjectSend: yes. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons