Kleeja vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKleejaPuter
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePHPTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 193★ 43,003
First released20062026
ReplacesWeTransfer

Why pick each one

Choose Kleeja if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in PHP
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Kleeja details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kleeja or Puter better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community, while Kleeja is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Kleeja and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. Kleeja is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kleeja and Puter with Docker?

Kleeja: check the project docs for container support. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons