Linx vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureLinxPuter
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 1,581★ 43,003
First released20152026
ReplacesWeTransfer, Imgur

Why pick each one

Choose Linx if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
Linx details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is Linx or Puter better?

Neither is universally better. Puter has the larger community, while Linx is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Linx and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. Linx is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Linx and Puter with Docker?

Linx: yes. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons