Chevereto vs Linx
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Chevereto
Self-hosted image hosting and sharing platform
VS
Linx
Self-hosted file and code paste sharing server
| Feature | Chevereto | Linx |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | File Sync & Storage |
| License | Proprietary | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 951 | ★ 1,581 |
| First released | 2013 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Imgur, Flickr | WeTransfer, Imgur |
Why pick each one
Choose Linx if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Chevereto or Linx better?
Neither is universally better. Linx has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Chevereto and Linx free and open-source?
Yes. Chevereto is licensed under Proprietary and Linx under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Chevereto and Linx with Docker?
Chevereto: yes. Linx: yes.