Chevereto vs Coppermine
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Chevereto
Self-hosted image hosting and sharing platform
VS
Coppermine
Multi-purpose, full-featured web picture gallery
| Feature | Chevereto | Coppermine |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | Proprietary | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 951 | ★ 73 |
| First released | 2013 | 2002 |
| Replaces | Imgur, Flickr | Flickr |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Chevereto or Coppermine better?
Chevereto is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Coppermine if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Chevereto and Coppermine free and open-source?
Yes. Chevereto is licensed under Proprietary and Coppermine under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Chevereto and Coppermine with Docker?
Chevereto: yes. Coppermine: check the project docs for container support.