Chevereto vs fgallery
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Chevereto | fgallery |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Read-the-docs project |
| Health score | 82 · Excellent | 9 · At risk |
| Status | Actively maintained | Archived |
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | Proprietary | MIT |
| Language | PHP | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 995 | ★ 248 |
| First released | 2013 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Imgur, Flickr | Flickr, Google Photos |
What are Chevereto and fgallery?
Chevereto
Chevereto is a self-hosted image hosting platform for uploading, organizing, and sharing images with the public or privately. It targets users who want their own image-sharing site. It is deployed via Docker or a PHP stack.
- Image upload and sharing
- User accounts and albums
- API for integrations
- Moderation tools
fgallery
fgallery is a static photo gallery generator that produces a minimalist, self-contained HTML gallery from a folder of images. The generated gallery is fully static, privacy-respecting, and can be hosted on any web server.
- Minimalist static galleries
- Self-contained output
- Mobile friendly
- No tracking
Chevereto vs fgallery: key differences
The biggest difference is maintenance: fgallery's repository is archived and no longer developed, while Chevereto is actively maintained. Chevereto is written in PHP, while fgallery is built with JavaScript. Licensing differs — Proprietary for Chevereto versus MIT for fgallery. Fgallery is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 512 MB for Chevereto. Chevereto has the considerably larger community, at 995 GitHub stars versus 248. Chevereto lists first-class Docker deployment; fgallery does not.
Why pick each one
Choose Chevereto if…
- Good Imgur-style site
- Multi-user
- API available
Watch out for
- Paid for full version
- Not open source
Choose fgallery if…
- Clean simple design
- Privacy respecting
Watch out for
- Command-line only
- Minimal features
Frequently asked questions
Is Chevereto or fgallery better?
Neither is universally better. Chevereto has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Chevereto and fgallery free and open-source?
Yes. Chevereto is licensed under Proprietary and fgallery under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Chevereto and fgallery with Docker?
Chevereto: yes. fgallery: check the project docs for container support.
Which is lighter on resources, Chevereto or fgallery?
fgallery has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 512 MB for Chevereto. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.