Chevereto vs fgallery
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Chevereto
Self-hosted image hosting and sharing platform
VS
fgallery
Minimalist static photo gallery generator
| Feature | Chevereto | fgallery |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | Proprietary | MIT |
| Language | PHP | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 951 | ★ 251 |
| First released | 2013 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Imgur, Flickr | Flickr, Google Photos |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Chevereto or fgallery better?
Neither is universally better. Chevereto has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Chevereto and fgallery free and open-source?
Yes. Chevereto is licensed under Proprietary and fgallery under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Chevereto and fgallery with Docker?
Chevereto: yes. fgallery: check the project docs for container support.