fgallery vs MyPhotoShare
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | fgallery | MyPhotoShare |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Read-the-docs project | Read-the-docs project |
| Health score | 9 · At risk | 0 · At risk |
| Status | Archived | Actively maintained |
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 248 | ★ 15 |
| First released | 2013 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Flickr, Google Photos | Google Photos, Flickr |
What are fgallery and MyPhotoShare?
fgallery
fgallery is a static photo gallery generator that produces a minimalist, self-contained HTML gallery from a folder of images. The generated gallery is fully static, privacy-respecting, and can be hosted on any web server.
- Minimalist static galleries
- Self-contained output
- Mobile friendly
- No tracking
MyPhotoShare
MyPhotoShare is a self-hosted, lightweight photo gallery generator that creates a static web gallery from a folder of photos and videos. It produces a fast, responsive browsing experience with no database or server-side code needed.
- Static photo gallery generator
- No database needed
- Responsive browsing
- Video support
fgallery vs MyPhotoShare: key differences
The biggest difference is maintenance: fgallery's repository is archived and no longer developed, while MyPhotoShare is actively maintained. Both projects are written in JavaScript. Licensing differs — MIT for fgallery versus GPL-3.0 for MyPhotoShare. Fgallery is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 256 MB for MyPhotoShare. Fgallery has the considerably larger community, at 248 GitHub stars versus 15.
Why pick each one
Choose fgallery if…
- Clean simple design
- Privacy respecting
Watch out for
- Command-line only
- Minimal features
Choose MyPhotoShare if…
- Fast static output
- Low maintenance
Watch out for
- No upload interface
- Regeneration required for changes
Frequently asked questions
Is fgallery or MyPhotoShare better?
fgallery is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider fgallery if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are fgallery and MyPhotoShare free and open-source?
Yes. fgallery is licensed under MIT and MyPhotoShare under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run fgallery and MyPhotoShare with Docker?
fgallery: check the project docs for container support. MyPhotoShare: check the project docs for container support.
Which is lighter on resources, fgallery or MyPhotoShare?
fgallery has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for MyPhotoShare. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.