fgallery vs MyPhotoShare
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
fgallery
Minimalist static photo gallery generator
VS
MyPhotoShare
Static web photo gallery generator from a folder of media
| Feature | fgallery | MyPhotoShare |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 251 | ★ 15 |
| First released | 2013 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Flickr, Google Photos | Google Photos, Flickr |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is fgallery or MyPhotoShare better?
fgallery is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider MyPhotoShare if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are fgallery and MyPhotoShare free and open-source?
Yes. fgallery is licensed under MIT and MyPhotoShare under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run fgallery and MyPhotoShare with Docker?
fgallery: check the project docs for container support. MyPhotoShare: check the project docs for container support.