fgallery vs Google Photos Takeout Helper
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | fgallery | Google Photos Takeout Helper |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Read-the-docs project | Read-the-docs project |
| Health score | 9 · At risk | 22 · At risk |
| Status | Archived | Actively maintained |
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Dart |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 248 | ★ 5,915 |
| First released | 2013 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Flickr, Google Photos | Google Photos |
What are fgallery and Google Photos Takeout Helper?
fgallery
fgallery is a static photo gallery generator that produces a minimalist, self-contained HTML gallery from a folder of images. The generated gallery is fully static, privacy-respecting, and can be hosted on any web server.
- Minimalist static galleries
- Self-contained output
- Mobile friendly
- No tracking
Google Photos Takeout Helper
Google Photos Takeout Helper is a command-line tool that processes a Google Photos Takeout archive and reconstructs a properly organized, metadata-correct photo library. It is widely used when migrating from Google Photos to self-hosted services like Immich.
- Processes Google Takeout archives
- Restores correct EXIF dates
- Organizes into albums
- Migration aid for self-hosting
fgallery vs Google Photos Takeout Helper: key differences
The biggest difference is maintenance: fgallery's repository is archived and no longer developed, while Google Photos Takeout Helper is actively maintained. Fgallery is written in JavaScript, while Google Photos Takeout Helper is built with Dart. Licensing differs — MIT for fgallery versus Apache-2.0 for Google Photos Takeout Helper. Fgallery is the lighter option, starting around 128 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Google Photos Takeout Helper. Fgallery is the more established project (first released 2013), while Google Photos Takeout Helper arrived in 2019. Google Photos Takeout Helper has the considerably larger community, at 5,915 GitHub stars versus 248.
Why pick each one
Choose fgallery if…
- Clean simple design
- Privacy respecting
Watch out for
- Command-line only
- Minimal features
Choose Google Photos Takeout Helper if…
- Essential for migration
- Actively maintained
Watch out for
- One-time use tool
- Command-line oriented
Frequently asked questions
Is fgallery or Google Photos Takeout Helper better?
Neither is universally better. Google Photos Takeout Helper has the larger community, while fgallery is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are fgallery and Google Photos Takeout Helper free and open-source?
Yes. fgallery is licensed under MIT and Google Photos Takeout Helper under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run fgallery and Google Photos Takeout Helper with Docker?
fgallery: check the project docs for container support. Google Photos Takeout Helper: check the project docs for container support.
Which is lighter on resources, fgallery or Google Photos Takeout Helper?
fgallery has the smaller minimum footprint at 128 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Google Photos Takeout Helper. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.
Related comparisons
- fgallery vs Chevereto
- fgallery vs Coppermine
- fgallery vs Damselfly
- Google Photos Takeout Helper vs Damselfly
- fgallery vs Damselfly Web
- fgallery vs digiKam
- Google Photos Takeout Helper vs digiKam
- fgallery vs Ente Photos
- Google Photos Takeout Helper vs Ente Photos
- fgallery vs HomeGallery
- Google Photos Takeout Helper vs HomeGallery