SHSelfHostIndex

fgallery vs Google Photos Takeout Helper

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FG fgallery Minimalist static photo gallery generator VS GO Google Photos Takeout Helper Organizes Google Photos Takeout exports into a clean library
FeaturefgalleryGoogle Photos Takeout Helper
CategoryPhoto ManagementPhoto Management
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageJavaScriptDart
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcebinary, source
GitHub stars★ 251★ 5,842
First released20132019
ReplacesFlickr, Google PhotosGoogle Photos

Why pick each one

Choose fgallery if…

  • Clean simple design
  • Privacy respecting
fgallery details

Choose Google Photos Takeout Helper if…

  • Essential for migration
  • Actively maintained
Google Photos Takeout Helper details

Frequently asked questions

Is fgallery or Google Photos Takeout Helper better?

Neither is universally better. Google Photos Takeout Helper has the larger community, while fgallery is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are fgallery and Google Photos Takeout Helper free and open-source?

Yes. fgallery is licensed under MIT and Google Photos Takeout Helper under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run fgallery and Google Photos Takeout Helper with Docker?

fgallery: check the project docs for container support. Google Photos Takeout Helper: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons