fgallery vs HomeGallery
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
fgallery
Minimalist static photo gallery generator
VS
HomeGallery
Self-hosted browsable photo and video gallery with similarity search
| Feature | fgallery | HomeGallery |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 251 | ★ 1,170 |
| First released | 2013 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Flickr, Google Photos | Google Photos |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is fgallery or HomeGallery better?
Neither is universally better. HomeGallery has the larger community, while fgallery is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are fgallery and HomeGallery free and open-source?
Yes. fgallery is licensed under MIT and HomeGallery under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run fgallery and HomeGallery with Docker?
fgallery: check the project docs for container support. HomeGallery: yes.