Coppermine vs nanogallery2

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCopperminenanogallery2
Deploy effortRead-the-docs projectRead-the-docs project
Health score57 · Fair12 · At risk
CategoryPhoto ManagementPhoto Management
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguagePHPJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM256 MB64 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 73★ 791
First released20022017
ReplacesFlickrFlickr, SmugMug

What are Coppermine and nanogallery2?

Coppermine

Coppermine is a multi-purpose, fully featured web picture gallery that supports user uploads, ratings, and comments. It is one of the longest-running open-source gallery scripts and runs on a standard PHP and MySQL stack.

  • User uploads and ratings
  • Comments and moderation
  • Theming support
  • Batch import

nanogallery2

nanogallery2 is an open-source JavaScript photo and video gallery library that builds responsive, touch-enabled galleries from images stored on your own server. It runs fully client-side and is self-hosted on any static web host.

  • Responsive image galleries
  • Touch and swipe support
  • Lightbox display
  • Multiple data sources

Coppermine vs nanogallery2: key differences

Coppermine is written in PHP, while nanogallery2 is built with JavaScript. Nanogallery2 is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 256 MB for Coppermine. Coppermine is the more established project (first released 2002), while nanogallery2 arrived in 2017. Nanogallery2 has the considerably larger community, at 791 GitHub stars versus 73.

Why pick each one

Choose Coppermine if…

  • Very mature
  • Community moderation tools

Watch out for

  • Dated interface
  • Aging codebase
Coppermine details

Choose nanogallery2 if…

  • Fully client-side
  • Easy to embed

Watch out for

  • Library, not a full app
  • No upload management
nanogallery2 details

Frequently asked questions

Is Coppermine or nanogallery2 better?

nanogallery2 is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Coppermine if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Coppermine and nanogallery2 free and open-source?

Yes. Coppermine is licensed under GPL-3.0 and nanogallery2 under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Coppermine and nanogallery2 with Docker?

Coppermine: check the project docs for container support. nanogallery2: check the project docs for container support.

Which is lighter on resources, Coppermine or nanogallery2?

nanogallery2 has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for Coppermine. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons