MyPhotoShare vs nanogallery2
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | MyPhotoShare | nanogallery2 |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Read-the-docs project | Read-the-docs project |
| Health score | 0 · At risk | 12 · At risk |
| Category | Photo Management | Photo Management |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 15 | ★ 791 |
| First released | 2014 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Google Photos, Flickr | Flickr, SmugMug |
What are MyPhotoShare and nanogallery2?
MyPhotoShare
MyPhotoShare is a self-hosted, lightweight photo gallery generator that creates a static web gallery from a folder of photos and videos. It produces a fast, responsive browsing experience with no database or server-side code needed.
- Static photo gallery generator
- No database needed
- Responsive browsing
- Video support
nanogallery2
nanogallery2 is an open-source JavaScript photo and video gallery library that builds responsive, touch-enabled galleries from images stored on your own server. It runs fully client-side and is self-hosted on any static web host.
- Responsive image galleries
- Touch and swipe support
- Lightbox display
- Multiple data sources
MyPhotoShare vs nanogallery2: key differences
Both projects are written in JavaScript. Nanogallery2 is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 256 MB for MyPhotoShare. MyPhotoShare is the more established project (first released 2014), while nanogallery2 arrived in 2017. Nanogallery2 has the considerably larger community, at 791 GitHub stars versus 15.
Why pick each one
Choose MyPhotoShare if…
- Fast static output
- Low maintenance
Watch out for
- No upload interface
- Regeneration required for changes
Choose nanogallery2 if…
- Fully client-side
- Easy to embed
Watch out for
- Library, not a full app
- No upload management
Frequently asked questions
Is MyPhotoShare or nanogallery2 better?
nanogallery2 is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider MyPhotoShare if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are MyPhotoShare and nanogallery2 free and open-source?
Yes. MyPhotoShare is licensed under GPL-3.0 and nanogallery2 under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run MyPhotoShare and nanogallery2 with Docker?
MyPhotoShare: check the project docs for container support. nanogallery2: check the project docs for container support.
Which is lighter on resources, MyPhotoShare or nanogallery2?
nanogallery2 has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 256 MB for MyPhotoShare. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.