copyparty vs ProjectSend

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecopypartyProjectSend
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITGPL-2.0
LanguagePythonPHP
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 46,121★ 1,958
First released20192012
ReplacesDropbox, Google DriveDropbox, WeTransfer

Why pick each one

Choose copyparty if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 46.1k GitHub stars
copyparty details

Choose ProjectSend if…

  • Great for client deliverables
  • Simple to operate
  • Clear access control
ProjectSend details

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or ProjectSend better?

Neither is universally better. copyparty has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are copyparty and ProjectSend free and open-source?

Yes. copyparty is licensed under MIT and ProjectSend under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run copyparty and ProjectSend with Docker?

copyparty: yes. ProjectSend: yes.

Related comparisons