Plik vs PsiTransfer
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Plik
Temporary file upload system (Wetransfer like)
VS
PsiTransfer
Simple open-source file sharing solution
| Feature | Plik | PsiTransfer |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,810 | ★ 1,920 |
| First released | 2026 | 2017 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer | WeTransfer |
Why pick each one
Choose Plik if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Choose PsiTransfer if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Plik or PsiTransfer better?
PsiTransfer is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Plik if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Plik and PsiTransfer free and open-source?
Yes. Plik is licensed under MIT and PsiTransfer under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Plik and PsiTransfer with Docker?
Plik: check the project docs for container support. PsiTransfer: yes.