Linx vs Plik
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Linx
Self-hosted file and code paste sharing server
VS
Plik
Temporary file upload system (Wetransfer like)
| Feature | Linx | Plik |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,581 | ★ 1,810 |
| First released | 2015 | 2026 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer, Imgur | WeTransfer |
Why pick each one
Choose Linx if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
Choose Plik if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Linx or Plik better?
Neither is universally better. Plik has the larger community, while Linx is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Linx and Plik free and open-source?
Yes. Linx is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Plik under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Linx and Plik with Docker?
Linx: yes. Plik: check the project docs for container support.