Kleeja vs Plik
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Kleeja
Free upload and file-sharing application
VS
Plik
Temporary file upload system (Wetransfer like)
| Feature | Kleeja | Plik |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | PHP | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 193 | ★ 1,810 |
| First released | 2006 | 2026 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer | WeTransfer |
Why pick each one
Choose Kleeja if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Choose Plik if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Kleeja or Plik better?
Neither is universally better. Plik has the larger community, while Kleeja is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Kleeja and Plik free and open-source?
Yes. Kleeja is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Plik under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kleeja and Plik with Docker?
Kleeja: check the project docs for container support. Plik: check the project docs for container support.