Plik vs ProjectSend
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Plik
Temporary file upload system (Wetransfer like)
VS
ProjectSend
Self-hosted client-oriented file sharing
| Feature | Plik | ProjectSend |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | File Sync & Storage |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Go | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,810 | ★ 1,958 |
| First released | 2026 | 2012 |
| Replaces | WeTransfer | Dropbox, WeTransfer |
Why pick each one
Choose Plik if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Choose ProjectSend if…
- Great for client deliverables
- Simple to operate
- Clear access control
Frequently asked questions
Is Plik or ProjectSend better?
ProjectSend is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Plik if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Plik and ProjectSend free and open-source?
Yes. Plik is licensed under MIT and ProjectSend under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Plik and ProjectSend with Docker?
Plik: check the project docs for container support. ProjectSend: yes.