Pingvin Share vs Syncthing

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePingvin ShareSyncthing
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseBSD-2-ClauseMPL-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, binary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 4,684★ 87,439
First released20222014
ReplacesWeTransfer, Firefox SendDropbox, Resilio Sync

Why pick each one

Choose Pingvin Share if…

  • Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (4.7k GitHub stars)
Pingvin Share details

Choose Syncthing if…

  • No central server needed
  • Very private by design
  • Lightweight and reliable
Syncthing details

Frequently asked questions

Is Pingvin Share or Syncthing better?

Neither is universally better. Syncthing has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Pingvin Share and Syncthing free and open-source?

Yes. Pingvin Share is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and Syncthing under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Pingvin Share and Syncthing with Docker?

Pingvin Share: yes. Syncthing: yes.

Related comparisons