copyparty vs Pingvin Share

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecopypartyPingvin Share
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITBSD-2-Clause
LanguagePythonTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 46,121★ 4,684
First released20192022
ReplacesDropbox, Google DriveWeTransfer, Firefox Send

Why pick each one

Choose copyparty if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 46.1k GitHub stars
copyparty details

Choose Pingvin Share if…

  • Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (4.7k GitHub stars)
Pingvin Share details

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or Pingvin Share better?

Neither is universally better. copyparty has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are copyparty and Pingvin Share free and open-source?

Yes. copyparty is licensed under MIT and Pingvin Share under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run copyparty and Pingvin Share with Docker?

copyparty: yes. Pingvin Share: yes.

Related comparisons