FilePizza vs Pingvin Share

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFilePizzaPingvin Share
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseBSD-2-Clause
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM50 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 10,129★ 4,684
First released20232022
ReplacesWeTransferWeTransfer, Firefox Send

Why pick each one

Choose FilePizza if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Mature project with 10.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
FilePizza details

Choose Pingvin Share if…

  • Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (4.7k GitHub stars)
Pingvin Share details

Frequently asked questions

Is FilePizza or Pingvin Share better?

Neither is universally better. FilePizza has the larger community, while Pingvin Share is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are FilePizza and Pingvin Share free and open-source?

Yes. FilePizza is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Pingvin Share under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run FilePizza and Pingvin Share with Docker?

FilePizza: check the project docs for container support. Pingvin Share: yes.

Related comparisons