Password Pusher vs Hemmelig
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Password Pusher
Dead-simple application to securely communicate passwords (or text)
VS
Hemmelig
Encrypted secret and text sharing service
| Feature | Password Pusher | Hemmelig |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | Ruby | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,145 | ★ 1,229 |
| First released | 2026 | 2022 |
| Replaces | — | PrivateBin, One-Time Secret |
Why pick each one
Choose Password Pusher if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (3.1k GitHub stars)
Choose Hemmelig if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is Password Pusher or Hemmelig better?
Neither is universally better. Password Pusher has the larger community, while Hemmelig is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Password Pusher and Hemmelig free and open-source?
Yes. Password Pusher is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Hemmelig under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Password Pusher and Hemmelig with Docker?
Password Pusher: yes. Hemmelig: yes.