ByteStash vs Hemmelig

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureByteStashHemmelig
CategoryPastebins & SnippetsPastebins & Snippets
LicenseGPL-3.0BSD-3-Clause
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 2,514★ 1,229
First released20262022
ReplacesPrivateBin, One-Time Secret

Why pick each one

Choose ByteStash if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
ByteStash details

Choose Hemmelig if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
Hemmelig details

Frequently asked questions

Is ByteStash or Hemmelig better?

Neither is universally better. ByteStash has the larger community, while Hemmelig is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are ByteStash and Hemmelig free and open-source?

Yes. ByteStash is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Hemmelig under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run ByteStash and Hemmelig with Docker?

ByteStash: yes. Hemmelig: yes.

Related comparisons