openstreetmap-tile-server vs Protomaps

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featureopenstreetmap-tile-serverProtomaps
CategoryMaps & GISMaps & GIS
LicenseMITBSD-3-Clause
LanguageShellTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM4,096 MB256 MB
Deploymentdockerbinary, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 1,452★ 2,980
First released20172021
ReplacesGoogle MapsMapbox, Google Maps

Why pick each one

Choose openstreetmap-tile-server if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.5k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Shell
openstreetmap-tile-server details

Choose Protomaps if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Active community (3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Protomaps details

Frequently asked questions

Is openstreetmap-tile-server or Protomaps better?

Neither is universally better. Protomaps has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are openstreetmap-tile-server and Protomaps free and open-source?

Yes. openstreetmap-tile-server is licensed under MIT and Protomaps under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run openstreetmap-tile-server and Protomaps with Docker?

openstreetmap-tile-server: yes. Protomaps: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons