Mapnik vs Protomaps

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMapnikProtomaps
CategoryMaps & GISMaps & GIS
LicenseLGPL-2.1BSD-3-Clause
LanguageC++TypeScript
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbinary, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 3,949★ 2,980
First released20062021
ReplacesGoogle Maps, MapboxMapbox, Google Maps

Why pick each one

Choose Mapnik if…

  • Released under the LGPL-2.1 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.9k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C++
Mapnik details

Choose Protomaps if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Active community (3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Protomaps details

Frequently asked questions

Is Mapnik or Protomaps better?

Neither is universally better. Mapnik has the larger community, while Protomaps is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Mapnik and Protomaps free and open-source?

Yes. Mapnik is licensed under LGPL-2.1 and Protomaps under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Mapnik and Protomaps with Docker?

Mapnik: yes. Protomaps: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons