Mapnik vs OpenMapTiles

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMapnikOpenMapTiles
CategoryMaps & GISMaps & GIS
LicenseLGPL-2.1BSD-3-Clause
LanguageC++PLpgSQL
Setup difficultyHardHard
Min. RAM2,048 MB8,192 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 3,949★ 3,133
First released20062016
ReplacesGoogle Maps, MapboxMapbox

Why pick each one

Choose Mapnik if…

  • Released under the LGPL-2.1 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.9k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C++
Mapnik details

Choose OpenMapTiles if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.1k GitHub stars)
  • Written in PLpgSQL
OpenMapTiles details

Frequently asked questions

Is Mapnik or OpenMapTiles better?

Neither is universally better. Mapnik has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Mapnik and OpenMapTiles free and open-source?

Yes. Mapnik is licensed under LGPL-2.1 and OpenMapTiles under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Mapnik and OpenMapTiles with Docker?

Mapnik: yes. OpenMapTiles: yes.

Related comparisons