Mapnik vs openstreetmap-tile-server

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMapnikopenstreetmap-tile-server
CategoryMaps & GISMaps & GIS
LicenseLGPL-2.1MIT
LanguageC++Shell
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB4,096 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 3,949★ 1,452
First released20062017
ReplacesGoogle Maps, MapboxGoogle Maps

Why pick each one

Choose Mapnik if…

  • Released under the LGPL-2.1 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.9k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C++
Mapnik details

Choose openstreetmap-tile-server if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (1.5k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Shell
openstreetmap-tile-server details

Frequently asked questions

Is Mapnik or openstreetmap-tile-server better?

Neither is universally better. Mapnik has the larger community, while openstreetmap-tile-server is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Mapnik and openstreetmap-tile-server free and open-source?

Yes. Mapnik is licensed under LGPL-2.1 and openstreetmap-tile-server under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Mapnik and openstreetmap-tile-server with Docker?

Mapnik: yes. openstreetmap-tile-server: yes.

Related comparisons