OpenStreetMap Website vs Protomaps
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | OpenStreetMap Website | Protomaps |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Read-the-docs project |
| Health score | 84 · Excellent | 84 · Excellent |
| Category | Maps & GIS | Maps & GIS |
| License | GPL-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | Ruby | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | binary, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,834 | ★ 3,056 |
| First released | 2006 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Google Maps | Mapbox, Google Maps |
What are OpenStreetMap Website and Protomaps?
OpenStreetMap Website
The OpenStreetMap website is the open-source Rails application that runs openstreetmap.org. It provides the map browsing interface, data editing tools, and user accounts for the collaborative world map.
- Collaborative map editing
- User accounts and diaries
- Map data API
- Open map data
Protomaps
Protomaps is an open-source project for displaying maps from a single static file in the PMTiles format. It enables serverless map hosting on object storage or a CDN with no tile server required.
- Single-file map archives
- Serverless hosting
- Works on object storage
- Cheap to operate
OpenStreetMap Website vs Protomaps: key differences
OpenStreetMap Website is written in Ruby, while Protomaps is built with TypeScript. Licensing differs — GPL-2.0 for OpenStreetMap Website versus BSD-3-Clause for Protomaps. Protomaps is the lighter option, starting around 256 MB of RAM against 4,096 MB for OpenStreetMap Website. OpenStreetMap Website is the more established project (first released 2006), while Protomaps arrived in 2021. OpenStreetMap Website lists first-class Docker deployment; Protomaps does not.
Why pick each one
Choose OpenStreetMap Website if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in Ruby
Choose Protomaps if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Active community (3.1k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenStreetMap Website or Protomaps better?
Protomaps is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider OpenStreetMap Website if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are OpenStreetMap Website and Protomaps free and open-source?
Yes. OpenStreetMap Website is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Protomaps under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OpenStreetMap Website and Protomaps with Docker?
OpenStreetMap Website: yes. Protomaps: check the project docs for container support.
Which is lighter on resources, OpenStreetMap Website or Protomaps?
Protomaps has the smaller minimum footprint at 256 MB of RAM, compared to about 4,096 MB for OpenStreetMap Website. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.
Related comparisons
- OpenStreetMap Website vs Headway
- Protomaps vs Headway
- OpenStreetMap Website vs Mapnik
- Protomaps vs Mapnik
- OpenStreetMap Website vs OpenStreetMap Carto
- Protomaps vs OpenStreetMap Carto
- OpenStreetMap Website vs openstreetmap-tile-server
- Protomaps vs openstreetmap-tile-server
- OpenStreetMap Website vs Tangram
- Protomaps vs Tangram