OpenStreetMap Website vs Protomaps

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureOpenStreetMap WebsiteProtomaps
CategoryMaps & GISMaps & GIS
LicenseGPL-2.0BSD-3-Clause
LanguageRubyTypeScript
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM4,096 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbinary, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 2,796★ 2,980
First released20062021
ReplacesGoogle MapsMapbox, Google Maps

Why pick each one

Choose OpenStreetMap Website if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Ruby
OpenStreetMap Website details

Choose Protomaps if…

  • Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
  • Active community (3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Protomaps details

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenStreetMap Website or Protomaps better?

Protomaps is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider OpenStreetMap Website if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are OpenStreetMap Website and Protomaps free and open-source?

Yes. OpenStreetMap Website is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Protomaps under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run OpenStreetMap Website and Protomaps with Docker?

OpenStreetMap Website: yes. Protomaps: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons