OpenKM Community vs Stirling PDF
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
OpenKM Community
Enterprise document management and content platform
VS
Stirling PDF
Powerful locally hosted web-based PDF toolkit
| Feature | OpenKM Community | Stirling PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Java | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 850 | ★ 89,077 |
| First released | 2006 | 2023 |
| Replaces | DocuWare, SharePoint | Adobe Acrobat, Smallpdf |
Why pick each one
Choose OpenKM Community if…
- Comprehensive enterprise features
- Mature platform
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenKM Community or Stirling PDF better?
Stirling PDF is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider OpenKM Community if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are OpenKM Community and Stirling PDF free and open-source?
Yes. OpenKM Community is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Stirling PDF under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OpenKM Community and Stirling PDF with Docker?
OpenKM Community: yes. Stirling PDF: yes.