Alfresco Community Edition vs Stirling PDF
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Alfresco Community Edition
Enterprise content and document management platform
VS
Stirling PDF
Powerful locally hosted web-based PDF toolkit
| Feature | Alfresco Community Edition | Stirling PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Java | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 226 | ★ 89,077 |
| First released | 2005 | 2023 |
| Replaces | SharePoint, Documentum | Adobe Acrobat, Smallpdf |
Why pick each one
Choose Alfresco Community Edition if…
- Enterprise grade features
- Strong API
Frequently asked questions
Is Alfresco Community Edition or Stirling PDF better?
Stirling PDF is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Alfresco Community Edition if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Alfresco Community Edition and Stirling PDF free and open-source?
Yes. Alfresco Community Edition is licensed under LGPL-3.0 and Stirling PDF under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Alfresco Community Edition and Stirling PDF with Docker?
Alfresco Community Edition: yes. Stirling PDF: yes.
Related comparisons
- Alfresco Community Edition vs BentoPDF
- Stirling PDF vs BentoPDF
- Alfresco Community Edition vs Documenso
- Stirling PDF vs Documenso
- Alfresco Community Edition vs DocuSeal
- Stirling PDF vs DocuSeal
- Alfresco Community Edition vs Filestash
- Stirling PDF vs Filestash
- Alfresco Community Edition vs Gotenberg
- Stirling PDF vs Gotenberg