Aleph vs Stirling PDF
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Aleph
Search and document management for investigative work
VS
Stirling PDF
Powerful locally hosted web-based PDF toolkit
| Feature | Aleph | Stirling PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,412 | ★ 89,077 |
| First released | 2016 | 2023 |
| Replaces | DocuWare, Relativity | Adobe Acrobat, Smallpdf |
Why pick each one
Choose Aleph if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Aleph or Stirling PDF better?
Stirling PDF is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Aleph if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Aleph and Stirling PDF free and open-source?
Yes. Aleph is licensed under MIT and Stirling PDF under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Aleph and Stirling PDF with Docker?
Aleph: yes. Stirling PDF: yes.