Floccus vs Omnivore

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted bookmarks & read-it-later options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFloccusOmnivore
CategoryBookmarks & Read-It-LaterBookmarks & Read-It-Later
LicenseMPL-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageJavaScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM64 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentsourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 8,322★ 16,211
First released20152022
ReplacesRaindrop.io, Chrome SyncPocket, Instapaper

Why pick each one

Choose Floccus if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 8.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
Floccus details

Choose Omnivore if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 16.2k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Omnivore details

Frequently asked questions

Is Floccus or Omnivore better?

Neither is universally better. Omnivore has the larger community, while Floccus is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Floccus and Omnivore free and open-source?

Yes. Floccus is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Omnivore under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Floccus and Omnivore with Docker?

Floccus: check the project docs for container support. Omnivore: yes.

Related comparisons