Archivy vs Floccus
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted bookmarks & read-it-later options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Archivy
Self-hosted knowledge repository for bookmarks and notes
VS
Floccus
Sync your browser bookmarks across browsers and devices
| Feature | Archivy | Floccus |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later |
| License | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | Python | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,268 | ★ 8,322 |
| First released | 2020 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Pocket, Evernote | Raindrop.io, Chrome Sync |
Why pick each one
Choose Archivy if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Choose Floccus if…
- Released under the MPL-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 8.3k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Archivy or Floccus better?
Floccus is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Archivy if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Archivy and Floccus free and open-source?
Yes. Archivy is licensed under MIT and Floccus under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Archivy and Floccus with Docker?
Archivy: yes. Floccus: check the project docs for container support.