Archivy vs Dnote
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Archivy
Self-hosted knowledge repository for bookmarks and notes
VS
Dnote
Simple command-line notebook with multi-device sync
| Feature | Archivy | Dnote |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later | Notes & Knowledge Base |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,268 | ★ 3,051 |
| First released | 2020 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Pocket, Evernote | Evernote, Simplenote |
Why pick each one
Choose Archivy if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Archivy or Dnote better?
Neither is universally better. Archivy has the larger community, while Dnote is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Archivy and Dnote free and open-source?
Yes. Archivy is licensed under MIT and Dnote under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Archivy and Dnote with Docker?
Archivy: yes. Dnote: yes.