42links vs Floccus
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted bookmarks & read-it-later options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
42links
Bookmarking server supporting multiple accounts
VS
Floccus
Sync your browser bookmarks across browsers and devices
| Feature | 42links | Floccus |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later |
| License | BSD-3-Clause-No-Military-License | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | CommonLisp | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | source |
| GitHub stars | — | ★ 8,322 |
| First released | 2020 | 2015 |
| Replaces | — | Raindrop.io, Chrome Sync |
Why pick each one
Choose 42links if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause-No-Military-License license
- Written in CommonLisp
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Floccus if…
- Released under the MPL-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 8.3k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is 42links or Floccus better?
Floccus is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider 42links if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are 42links and Floccus free and open-source?
Yes. 42links is licensed under BSD-3-Clause-No-Military-License and Floccus under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run 42links and Floccus with Docker?
42links: check the project docs for container support. Floccus: check the project docs for container support.