Linkwarden vs Floccus
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted bookmarks & read-it-later options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Linkwarden
Collaborative bookmark manager with page archiving
VS
Floccus
Sync your browser bookmarks across browsers and devices
| Feature | Linkwarden | Floccus |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 19,383 | ★ 8,322 |
| First released | 2022 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Pocket, Raindrop.io | Raindrop.io, Chrome Sync |
Why pick each one
Choose Floccus if…
- Released under the MPL-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 8.3k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Linkwarden or Floccus better?
Neither is universally better. Linkwarden has the larger community, while Floccus is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Linkwarden and Floccus free and open-source?
Yes. Linkwarden is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Floccus under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Linkwarden and Floccus with Docker?
Linkwarden: yes. Floccus: check the project docs for container support.