Archivy vs Omnivore

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted bookmarks & read-it-later options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureArchivyOmnivore
CategoryBookmarks & Read-It-LaterBookmarks & Read-It-Later
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguagePythonTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM256 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 3,268★ 16,211
First released20202022
ReplacesPocket, EvernotePocket, Instapaper

Why pick each one

Choose Archivy if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Python
Archivy details

Choose Omnivore if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 16.2k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Omnivore details

Frequently asked questions

Is Archivy or Omnivore better?

Neither is universally better. Omnivore has the larger community, while Archivy is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Archivy and Omnivore free and open-source?

Yes. Archivy is licensed under MIT and Omnivore under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Archivy and Omnivore with Docker?

Archivy: yes. Omnivore: yes.

Related comparisons