Floccus vs SyncMarks

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted bookmarks & read-it-later options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFloccusSyncMarks
CategoryBookmarks & Read-It-LaterBookmarks & Read-It-Later
LicenseMPL-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageJavaScriptPHP
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentsourcebare-metal
GitHub stars★ 8,322
First released20152020
ReplacesRaindrop.io, Chrome Sync

Why pick each one

Choose Floccus if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 8.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
Floccus details

Choose SyncMarks if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Written in PHP
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
SyncMarks details

Frequently asked questions

Is Floccus or SyncMarks better?

Floccus is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider SyncMarks if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Floccus and SyncMarks free and open-source?

Yes. Floccus is licensed under MPL-2.0 and SyncMarks under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Floccus and SyncMarks with Docker?

Floccus: check the project docs for container support. SyncMarks: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons