ArchiveBox vs SyncMarks
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted bookmarks & read-it-later options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
ArchiveBox
Self-hosted web archiving from bookmarks and feeds
VS
SyncMarks
Sync and manage your browser bookmarks from Edge, Firefox and Chromium
| Feature | ArchiveBox | SyncMarks |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later | Bookmarks & Read-It-Later |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 28,079 | — |
| First released | 2017 | 2020 |
| Replaces | — |
Why pick each one
Choose ArchiveBox if…
- Thorough page preservation
- Imports from many sources
- Open formats
Choose SyncMarks if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Written in PHP
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is ArchiveBox or SyncMarks better?
Neither is universally better. ArchiveBox has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are ArchiveBox and SyncMarks free and open-source?
Yes. ArchiveBox is licensed under MIT and SyncMarks under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ArchiveBox and SyncMarks with Docker?
ArchiveBox: yes. SyncMarks: check the project docs for container support.