NewsBlur vs osmos::feed

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureNewsBlurosmos::feed
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupRead-the-docs project
Health score91 · Excellent14 · At risk
CategoryRSS & News ReadersRSS & News Readers
LicenseMITMIT
LanguagePythonTypeScript
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM2,048 MB32 MB
Deploymentdockersource
GitHub stars★ 7,627★ 989
First released20092021
ReplacesFeedly, Google ReaderFeedly

What are NewsBlur and osmos::feed?

NewsBlur

NewsBlur is a personal news reader that brings together feeds with intelligent training to highlight stories you care about. It targets readers who want a smart, social feed reader. It is deployed via Docker Compose.

  • Story training and filtering
  • Social sharing of stories
  • Original site view
  • Mobile apps

Read the full NewsBlur guide →

osmos::feed

osmos::feed is a tool that turns a list of feeds into a self-hosted static RSS reader website using GitHub Actions. It requires no server and rebuilds the reader on a schedule.

  • Static site RSS reader
  • Runs on GitHub Actions
  • No server required

NewsBlur vs osmos::feed: key differences

NewsBlur is written in Python, while osmos::feed is built with TypeScript. Osmos::feed is the lighter option, starting around 32 MB of RAM against 2,048 MB for NewsBlur. NewsBlur is the more established project (first released 2009), while osmos::feed arrived in 2021. NewsBlur has the considerably larger community, at 7,627 GitHub stars versus 989. NewsBlur lists first-class Docker deployment; osmos::feed does not.

Why pick each one

Choose NewsBlur if…

  • Smart story highlighting
  • Good mobile apps
  • Social features

Watch out for

  • Complex multi-service stack
  • Heavy to self-host
NewsBlur details

Choose osmos::feed if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in TypeScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 32 MB RAM
osmos::feed details

Frequently asked questions

Is NewsBlur or osmos::feed better?

Neither is universally better. NewsBlur has the larger community, while osmos::feed is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are NewsBlur and osmos::feed free and open-source?

Yes. NewsBlur is licensed under MIT and osmos::feed under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run NewsBlur and osmos::feed with Docker?

NewsBlur: yes. osmos::feed: check the project docs for container support.

Which is lighter on resources, NewsBlur or osmos::feed?

osmos::feed has the smaller minimum footprint at 32 MB of RAM, compared to about 2,048 MB for NewsBlur. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons