Feedbin vs osmos::feed
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Feedbin
Nice, simple, open-source RSS reader
VS
osmos::feed
Build an RSS reader as a static site with GitHub Actions
| Feature | Feedbin | osmos::feed |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | docker | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,768 | ★ 991 |
| First released | 2013 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Feedly, Google Reader | Feedly |
Why pick each one
Choose Feedbin if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in Ruby
Choose osmos::feed if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 32 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Feedbin or osmos::feed better?
Neither is universally better. Feedbin has the larger community, while osmos::feed is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Feedbin and osmos::feed free and open-source?
Yes. Feedbin is licensed under MIT and osmos::feed under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Feedbin and osmos::feed with Docker?
Feedbin: yes. osmos::feed: check the project docs for container support.